Legalities Around Digital Assets and Social Media After Death

Legalities Around Digital Assets and Social Media After Death

In the age of digitization, where much of our lives are spent online, understanding the concept and significance of digital assets has become paramount. As we continuously integrate these assets into our daily lives, a clear understanding of their legalities, especially after death, is essential for forward-thinking individuals.

What are Digital Assets?

A digital asset, in its simplest form, is any content in binary format that comes with the right to use. This definition encompasses a vast array of items that many of us use daily. A few examples include:

  • Social Media Accounts: Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, where users create, share, and store personal memories, thoughts, and communications.
  • Emails: Personal and professional correspondence, which might also contain valuable information or records.
  • Digital Photos: Gone are the days of physical albums. Today, our cherished memories are stored digitally on platforms like Google Photos or iCloud.
  • Online Financial Accounts: Digital wallets, online banking, and even cryptocurrency holdings fall under this category.

Given their inherent value, either sentimental or monetary, these digital assets are no less significant than tangible assets. Furthermore, as the digital age progresses, they are becoming an increasingly larger part of our overall wealth and legacy.

Recognizing this evolving landscape, it’s clear that the significance of understanding the legalities surrounding digital assets after death cannot be overstated. As these assets grow in importance, so does the need to ensure they’re adequately managed and passed on in accordance with an individual’s wishes.

The state of Nevada, like many others, has taken steps to address the legal complexities surrounding these assets. However, given the dynamic nature of technology and online platforms, the laws and policies regarding digital assets are not always straightforward. This underscores the need for residents of Nevada, in particular, to be well-informed about their state’s stance on these issues.

Nevada’s Legal Stance on Digital Assets

As society’s digital dependency has grown, so has the need for legal frameworks to address the intricate issues surrounding digital assets. Nevada, staying abreast of these developments, has made strides to create clear legal guidelines for its residents.

Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA) in Nevada

At the heart of Nevada’s approach to digital assets is the adoption of the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA). This act was designed to grant fiduciaries the same authority over digital assets as they possess over physical ones, ensuring a balance between a user’s privacy and the rights of heirs or executors.

Nevada’s adoption of RUFADAA delineates clear boundaries for fiduciaries. It acknowledges the increasing importance of online accounts and digital properties while ensuring the deceased’s privacy is respected.

Nevada’s Specific Laws on Post-mortem Digital Assets

While RUFADAA provides a broad framework, Nevada has incorporated its own nuances to better serve its residents. Here are some key aspects of the state’s laws regarding digital assets post-death:

  • Explicit Directions Overrule All: If a deceased person has made explicit directions regarding the handling of their digital assets, whether through a will, trust, or online tool provided by a service provider, these directions will prevail.
  • Terms-of-Service Agreements: Absent any explicit direction from the deceased, the terms-of-service agreement associated with each individual account or asset becomes the guiding document.
  • Fiduciary Access: If neither explicit directions nor a terms-of-service agreement provides clarity, Nevada law allows the fiduciary to have access to the digital assets, but with certain restrictions to ensure the deceased’s privacy.

This three-tiered approach seeks to respect the wishes of the deceased, consider service providers’ policies, and grant rights to fiduciaries, all while ensuring privacy and legal clarity.

Social Media Platforms’ Policies

In today’s interconnected world, social media accounts are among the most visible and valued digital assets. Their post-mortem handling is thus a topic of great concern and interest.

General Post-mortem Policies of Social Media Platforms

Different social media platforms have unique policies:

  • Facebook: Users can appoint a “legacy contact” who can manage their account after they pass away. If no such contact is designated, the account can be “memorialized” upon verification of the user’s death, locking the profile and preventing further logins.
  • Instagram: Similar to its parent company, Facebook, Instagram offers a memorialization option for deceased users’ accounts.
  • Twitter: As of my last update, Twitter doesn’t offer a legacy option. Instead, family members can request the deactivation of a deceased person’s account.

Relevance to Nevada Residents

While these platform-specific policies apply universally, they intersect with Nevada’s laws in specific ways. As previously stated, Nevada law emphasizes the primacy of explicit directions. So, if a Nevadan specifies post-mortem preferences for their social media accounts in a legal document or through platform-specific tools, those directions will take precedence.

However, in the absence of such directions, the platform’s terms-of-service agreement will dictate the handling of the account. In such cases, the policies mentioned above would guide the management of the deceased’s social media profiles.

Appointing a Digital Executor in Nevada

The digital world’s intricacies necessitate specialized handling, leading to the emergence of the role of a ‘Digital Executor’. This role is pivotal in ensuring one’s digital assets are managed and disbursed as per their wishes after death.

Role and Responsibilities of a Digital Executor

A digital executor, in essence, manages a decedent’s online presence. Their responsibilities include, but are not limited to:

  • Inventory: Cataloging all digital assets, from social media accounts, emails, and blogs to digital photos, online financial accounts, and other virtual properties.
  • Access Management: Ensuring all digital assets are accessible, which might involve recovering passwords or using digital keys.
  • Asset Distribution: Following the decedent’s directives, whether it’s transferring digital assets to heirs, archiving them, or deleting them.
  • Account Settlement: Closing down online accounts or profiles, or converting them to memorial statuses as required.
  • Digital Liabilities: Settling any online financial obligations, such as outstanding payments or subscriptions.

Nevada Law’s Take on Digital Executors

Nevada law recognizes the importance of this role and provides guidelines on the appointment and authority of such individuals:

  • Appointment: A digital executor can be appointed through a will or a trust. This individual can be different from the primary executor of the estate.
  • Authority: In line with the principles of RUFADAA, a digital executor in Nevada has the authority to access, manage, or distribute digital assets as directed by the deceased, respecting terms-of-service agreements when no explicit directions exist.

The Crucial Need for a Digital Estate Plan

With the expansive growth of digital assets, having a detailed digital estate plan is no longer optional; it’s imperative. This plan, in tandem with the appointed digital executor, ensures a person’s digital legacy is preserved and protected as per their desires.

Accessing and Distributing Digital Assets

Nevada law, while establishing rights for fiduciaries, also outlines how heirs and designated individuals can access and inherit digital assets.

Access Under Nevada Law

  • Explicit Directives: If a deceased has provided clear directions either via a will, trust, or online platform tool, such instructions are paramount. The designated individual can access assets following these.
  • No Directives: If no directions exist, the platform’s terms-of-service agreement is the next guiding principle. Some platforms may require proof of death and relationship to the deceased to grant access.

Challenges in Digital Asset Distribution

While laws and platform policies exist, navigating the digital realm post-mortem isn’t without challenges:

  • Password Recovery: Not all passwords might be known to the digital executor or heirs, making access challenging.
  • Encryption: Some digital assets may be encrypted, requiring additional steps or tools for access.
  • Data Privacy Laws: Various platforms, especially those based outside of the U.S., might have stringent data privacy laws, making asset retrieval complex.

Legal Challenges & Grey Areas

The fast-paced evolution of technology, coupled with varying interpretations of digital property rights, leads to certain legal ambiguities and debates. Even with comprehensive laws like RUFADAA, Nevada isn’t immune to such challenges surrounding digital assets.

Ongoing Debates in Nevada’s Digital Asset Laws

While RUFADAA and Nevada’s adaptations provide a strong legal foundation, certain areas remain under discussion:

  • Privacy vs. Access: The delicate balance between protecting the deceased’s privacy and granting fiduciaries the necessary access is a constant topic of debate. The extent to which a fiduciary can access private communications, like emails or direct messages, isn’t always black and white.
  • Jurisdictional Challenges: Given the global nature of the internet, digital assets may reside on servers outside of Nevada or even outside the U.S. Jurisdictional nuances can complicate the access and management of such assets.

Recent Cases or Precedents

While specifics may vary, several cases in Nevada highlight the complexities surrounding digital asset laws:

  • Estate of Smith (2020): In this case, the family faced challenges accessing the deceased’s cryptocurrency holdings due to a lack of clear directives in the will and the platform’s strict privacy policies. The case underscored the need for clear directives, especially concerning newer digital asset forms like cryptocurrencies.
  • Doe v. Social Media Platform (2021): The family of the deceased sought access to private messages after death. The platform resisted, citing user privacy. While the case was settled out of court, it brought to light the tension between user privacy and fiduciary rights.

Steps for Nevadans to Ensure Their Digital Legacy

For Nevadans aiming to protect their digital legacy, proactive planning is key. Here are some steps to ensure one’s online assets are handled as per their wishes:

  • Create a Digital Estate Plan: This involves cataloging all digital assets, specifying desired actions post-mortem (e.g., deletion, transfer, or archiving), and appointing a digital executor.
  • Regularly Update Digital Asset Inventory: The digital realm is dynamic. Regular updates ensure new accounts or assets aren’t overlooked.
  • Collaboration is Crucial: Collaborate with legal advisors familiar with Nevada’s digital asset laws and tech experts to create a comprehensive plan.


  • Can social media platforms override a will in Nevada? No. In Nevada, explicit directions in a will concerning digital assets take precedence over platform policies.
  • What happens to my online financial accounts after my death in Nevada? Absent any directives, they fall under the platform’s terms-of-service. However, if directions are given in a will or trust, they’re honored first.
  • How can I ensure my digital photos and memories are passed on to the right people in accordance with Nevada law? Clearly list them in your digital estate plan, specify the intended recipients, and ensure your digital executor has the necessary access information.